Skip to main content

The Reader Response Notebook Overview


The Reader Response Notebook
By Ted Kesler
            The reader response notebook (RRN) is a ubiquitous tool in schools. In at least grades 2 through 8, teachers rely on this notebook as evidence of students’ reading. In my extensive visits to schools around the country, I noticed a common application for this notebook: students write summaries of the books they read, or respond to a teacher prompt, such as “Describe the main character” or “Tell what new information you learned from this text,” and always “Be sure to provide text evidence.” Ultimately, response after response by students are expository paragraphs or essays that are often solely directed to and read by the teacher for evaluation. Responses soon become monotonous, devoid of voice and intention. Here is an example from one of my 3rd grader students in my early years of classroom teaching:
The student met all the criteria for this response. She started with a topic sentence: a life lesson for the story, Uncle Jed’s Barbershop (Mitchell, 1998). She gave one piece of text evidence. She made a text-to-text connection to our read-aloud book, The Wheel on the School (DeJong, 1972). Notice the √+ at top: that was my marking system to monitor my students’ responses. Fine. But, expository responses often require substantial amounts of time, especially if they are done thoughtfully. We must consider the amount of time these kinds of written responses require that inevitably take away from students’ reading. Moreover, notice that, like most responses of this kind, the student wrote a retrospective account (Hancock, 1993): in other words, students respond after reading the text. These kinds of responses then limit their opportunities to develop their thinking during reading, or what Hancock (1993) calls introspective journeys. Finally, is this the only way to respond? What happens to students who are reluctant or resistant writers, or who do not represent their best thinking about the texts they read in writing?
In The Reader Response Notebook: Teaching Towards Agency, Autonomy, and Accountability (2018, NCTE), I propose three key changes to the way we teach the use of the reader response notebook. First, I encourage “designing on the page” that welcomes a wide array of writing and drawing resources. Second, I expand what counts as a text, including popular culture media. Third, I emphasize the sociocultural context of classroom literacy practices that supports students’ generative responses in their RRNs. My goal is to develop this ubiquitous tool for introspective journeys, where students can develop their thinking during reading.
Here are three examples from fifth grade students of the generative thinking that is possible once we open up these new ways of using the RRN:

Figure 1. A coded message about Eric’s message in The Bully Book.


Figure 2. Text Messaging for All of the Above.


Figure 3. Skelly’s Route in The Graduation of Jake Moon.
In Figure 1, Samantha used a coded message to reveal the protagonist, Eric’s motives in The Bully Book (Gale, 2013). In addition to showing impressive attention to detail, Samantha applied the same cryptic messages that Eric receives and uses throughout the book to solve the mystery of the Bully Book that torments his life. In Figure 2, Emma imagined a text message exchange between Mr. Collins, the 7th grade math teacher in All of the Above (Pearsall,2008), with his adult daughter, at a pivotal moment in the story, right after the tetrahedron project with his afterschool math club was destroyed. In the book, we only know that Mr. Collins has an adult daughter and a son, but we know nothing of his relationship with them. So, Emma used a popular social media format to imagine this relationship. In Figure 3, Elizabeth showed the route that Skelly, who has Alzheimer’s, took through the town on the night he wandered away from home unattended in The Graduation of Jake Moon (Park, 2002). Elizabeth both envisioned the layout of the town and synthesized textual evidence to trace Skelly’s route. As in Figure 2, Elizabeth identified a pivotal moment in the story, and then realized that a map might be the best way to depict the tension and resolution of this event. She purposefully applied resources for map making, such as colors, shapes, symbols, and lines. 
Ultimately, these new ways of using the RRN shape students’ identities towards becoming literate people. If we provide many opportunities for students’ risk-taking, approximations, and affiliation, and guide them to build bridges between school and their everyday literacy practices, they will strive towards proficiency. Their literacy development will become woven into who they are becoming in the world.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 What an incredible day observing the RRN in action as a tool for thinking to support students' discourse about their books in Dr. Dina Weiss's 4th grade classroom. Students had such a variety of ways of responding to realize themes in their novels with pronounced social justice themes. 
 Dina Weiss, 4th grade teacher, also uses the RRN with her undergraduate students at Queens College.  Dina reports:  QC students are developing their own reading responses that are accumulated in a journal for the purpose of showing their future students how to respond to text meaningfully. It's an assignment in my syllabus that they create a reading response, mentor journal that they can use during strategy group work to help students build their comprehension.  Here are some more photos. One of the QC students took it upon herself to create a new reading responses. She merged her love of art with the reading response work. She understood the power of reading responses to elevate a students deep thinking of a text. She made an Instagram page for a character, she visually showed the complexity of problems a character was having, and I she showed the intersection of theme and complexity of character relationships using a color-coded system.